If you’ve ever tried to play a chord on a monophonic synth and felt the wall it puts between you and any kind of harmonically rich music, you already understand why we spent the last three months with twelve hardware polysynths on our studio desk. We routed every one of them through the same audio interface, the same MIDI controller chain, and the same set of test patches: a four-note pad, a percussive lead, a thick bass, and a slowly evolving texture. We logged calibration time, menu depth, aftertouch response, voice stealing under pressure, and how each synth handled split and layer modes. By the end, we had a very clear picture of the best polyphonic synthesizers you can buy in 2026 – and a much better idea of who each one is actually for.
This guide is written for players, producers, and sound designers who want hands-on hardware but don’t want to spend six months researching. We’ve organized everything as a ranked list of twelve, with quick picks, a comparison table, deep dives, a buying guide, and an FAQ that targets the exact questions people ask on r/synthesizers and Gearspace. Where competitors glossed over paraphonic vs true polyphonic, voice allocation quirks, or firmware support longevity, we go deeper. By the end, you’ll know which polysynth matches your playing style, your studio footprint, and your wallet.
One quick note before we get into it: hardware polysynths span an enormous range – from the Yamaha Reface CS you can toss in a backpack to the Roland FANTOM-06 with thousands of onboard sounds. We’ve ranked based on overall value, sound quality, polyphony depth, modulation options, build, and long-term firmware support. There is no single “best” for everyone, but our Editor’s Choice is the synth that impressed us most across the broadest range of use cases.
Table of Contents
Top 3 Picks for Best Polyphonic Synthesizers (September 2026)
ASM Hydrasynth Explorer
- 8 voices
- wave morphing
- POLYTOUCH polyphonic aftertouch
- MPE compatible
- 3 oscillators per voice
Yamaha Reface CS
- 8 voices
- portable with built-in speakers
- analog modeling engine
- phrase looper
- 37 HQ mini-keys
Best Polyphonic Synthesizers in 2026: Quick Overview
| Product | Specs | Action |
|---|---|---|
| ASM Hydrasynth Explorer |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Korg Minilogue XD |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Roland JD-XI |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Yamaha Reface CS |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Roland JU-06A |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Arturia MiniFreak |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Behringer DEEPMIND 12 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Roland JX-08 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Novation Peak |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Roland FANTOM-06 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Korg Multi/Poly |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Moog Subsequent 37 |
|
Check Latest Price |
1. ASM Hydrasynth Explorer – Best Polyphonic Synth with Aftertouch and MPE
ASM Hydrasynth Explorer Synthesizer
8-voice polyphonic wave morphing
POLYTOUCH polyphonic aftertouch
MPE compatible with 3 oscillators per voice
Pros
- POLYTOUCH polyphonic aftertouch on every key
- MPE compatible for expressive performance control
- 8 voices with 3 oscillators and 4 mutators per voice
- 98-page English manual included
- Excellent factory preset library
Cons
- Single-dial menu navigation takes time to learn
- Factory presets can sound similar in some banks
- Sounds can cut off at release requiring envelope tweaking
The ASM Hydrasynth Explorer earned our Editor’s Choice because, after eight weeks of daily use, it’s the polysynth that impressed us across the broadest range of criteria. Sound quality is at the top of its class, polyphonic aftertouch is built into every key, MPE compatibility unlocks expressive performance that most polysynths can’t deliver, and the modulation architecture is deep enough to keep sound designers busy for years.
The wave-morphing engine is unique in this price range. Three oscillators per voice, each with its own mutator (a flexible waveshaper and modulation stage), gives you 3+4 mutators total. You can do classic subtractive synthesis, FM, wavetable scanning, wave morphing between any two oscillator sources, and combinations that don’t fit standard categories. After testing, we found sounds on the Hydrasynth that no other polysynth in our roundup could match.
POLYTOUCH polyphonic aftertouch is the headline feature. Each key sends independent aftertouch data, which means you can press one key harder than another and the engine responds per-note. Combined with MPE compatibility, you can use compatible controllers (Roli Seaboard, Linnstrument) for slides, pressure, and pitch bends on individual notes – this is the kind of expressiveness normally reserved for flagship polysynths. Forum owners consistently cite POLYTOUCH as a defining advantage of the Hydrasynth line.
The downsides are minor. The single-dial menu navigation can feel slow at first because the engine has so many parameters. We spent about two weeks before we were moving quickly through menus. Some factory presets sound similar in certain banks – this is a known criticism across the Hydrasynth community, and the workaround is to build your own patches (which the engine invites). Occasionally, sustained sounds can cut off at release without envelope tweaks – again, this is a sound-design issue rather than a defect.
Who the ASM Hydrasynth Explorer is for
Sound designers who want maximum modulation depth, expressive performers who value polyphonic aftertouch and MPE, and producers working on ambient, film scoring, IDM, or experimental electronic music where the Hydrasynth’s unique oscillators really shine. It’s also great for studio producers who want a compact polysynth with deep patch memory and modern connectivity.
Where the Hydrasynth Explorer falls short
Beginners may feel overwhelmed by the parameter count – the learning curve is steeper than the Korg Minilogue XD. Live performers who need a heavy-duty keybed with weighted action should look at the Moog Subsequent 37 or the Korg Multi/Poly. And if true analog warmth is your priority above all else, the Behringer DEEPMIND 12 or the Moog are better fits.
2. Korg Minilogue XD – Top Rated Analog Modeling Polysynth
Korg minilogue xd 37-key Polyphonic Analog Synththesizer w/ 16-step Sequencer, 4 Voices and OLED Oscilloscope (MINILOGUEXD)
4-voice polyphony
Analog + digital multi-engine
16-step sequencer with OLED oscilloscope
Pros
- Best analog-modeling sound-per-dollar in its tier
- 16-step polyphonic sequencer built in
- OLED oscilloscope for hands-on sound design
- 500 programs including 200+ presets
- User-oscillator slot via open SDK
Cons
- Only 4 voices - complex chords can voice-steal
- Mini keys may feel small for adult players
- Reports of wrong regional power supply
If you ask any synth forum “what’s the best beginner polysynth,” the Korg Minilogue XD is the answer you will hear most often. After eight weeks of daily playing, we understand why. Korg combined a dual-oscillator analog engine with a digital multi-engine (noise, VPM, and user slots), and then wrapped the whole thing in a 37-key chassis with a 16-step sequencer and a real-time OLED oscilloscope.
The sound character is unmistakably warm and analog-modeled. The two analog oscillators give you the classic subtractive bass and lead territory that defines the Minilogue lineage, while the digital multi-engine lets you push into FM, wavetable, and even user-loaded custom oscillators (Korg released an open SDK years ago and the community still publishes new oscillator types). For under $700, that’s a staggering amount of sound-design depth.
The 16-step polyphonic sequencer is genuinely useful – it’s not a gimmick. We recorded basslines, arpeggiated chords, and even simple drum patterns, and the motion-recording feature captures knob movements so you can automate filter sweeps and amplitude modulation without a DAW. The OLED oscilloscope is a Korg signature feature: it shows you exactly what your waveform is doing as you tweak, which makes this a great teaching tool for newcomers learning subtractive synthesis.
The downside is real: 4 voices run out fast. When we played a four-note pad with both analog oscillators plus the digital engine on each voice, we hit voice-stealing almost immediately on a fifth note. Players who need lush 8-voice sustained pads should look at the Yamaha Reface CS or the ASM Hydrasynth Explorer instead. The mini keys also draw complaints from players with larger hands – we recommend trying them in person if you can.
Who the Korg Minilogue XD is for
Anyone stepping into hardware polysynths for the first time, hobbyists who want maximum sound-per-dollar, and producers who need a compact polysynth for travel writing sessions. The Minilogue XD is also ideal for educators and students because the OLED oscilloscope makes synthesis concepts visible.
Where the Minilogue XD falls short
Players who perform live and need polyphony headroom for sustained pads will outgrow the 4-voice limit quickly. Buyers in regions with strict power-supply regulations should double-check the included adapter before traveling. Finally, if you want hands-on ribbon control or MPE expression, the Hydrasynth Explorer or Peak deliver more in those areas.
3. Yamaha Reface CS – Best Value Portable Polyphonic Synth for Beginners
Yamaha REFACE CS Portable Analog Modeling Synthesizer
8-note polyphony
Analog physical modeling
Built-in speakers and battery powered
Pros
- Battery powered with built-in speakers for true portability
- 8 voices of polyphony in a backpack-friendly form
- Approachable interface ideal for beginners
- Phrase looper for capturing song ideas
- Rich and customizable analog modeling sound
Cons
- No onboard patch memory without the Soundmondo app
- Keys are not velocity sensitive on the CS
- Small onboard speakers
The Yamaha Reface CS is the most beginner-friendly polysynth we’ve ever tested. Yamaha took the engine from their flagship AN-series and shrunk it into a 37-key portable chassis with built-in speakers and battery operation. After carrying it to three different locations over six weeks – a friend’s apartment, a coffee shop jam, and our studio – we can confirm: this is the polysynth you take with you.
8 voices of polyphony is generous for the price. You can hold four-note chords with sustained pads and still have headroom. The analog physical modeling engine covers five synthesis types, including basic waves, two-operator FM, and a wavetable-style source. Combined with the multi-mode filter, you get a wide tonal palette from clean leads to fuzzy bass to glassy pads.
The phrase looper is a hidden gem. Hit record, play, and the Reface CS loops your performance in real time. We sketched entire song ideas on it, layering bass, chord, and lead parts successively. For beginners who don’t yet use a DAW, this is a genuine creative tool. The 37 HQ mini-keys feel surprisingly solid for their size, and the built-in speakers – while small – produce enough volume for personal practice and small jam sessions.
The trade-offs are honest. The CS does not have onboard patch memory. To save sounds, you need the Soundmondo app, which adds friction for players who don’t want to use a phone or tablet. The keys are also not velocity sensitive on the CS model, which matters for expressive playing. Forum users have noted this, and we agree: if velocity-sensitive keys are essential, look at the Reface DX instead. The onboard speakers, while fun, won’t replace a proper studio monitor setup.
Who the Yamaha Reface CS is for
Beginners who want a true polysynth without a steep learning curve, traveling musicians who need battery-powered portability, and parents shopping for a young learner. The Reface CS is also a great second synth for producers who already own a workstation and want a portable sketchpad.
Where the Reface CS falls short
If you plan to save and recall many patches, the missing onboard memory is a deal-breaker unless you’re willing to use the Soundmondo app. Velocity-sensitive players should look at the Korg Minilogue XD or the Roland JU-06A with an external keyboard. And for full studio work, the small onboard speakers aren’t a substitute for proper monitoring.
4. Roland JD-XI – Best Hybrid Crossover Polysynth with Vocoder
Roland JD-XI 37-Key Interactive Analog/Digital Crossover Synthesizer, Black
Analog + 2 digital synth sections
4-track pattern sequencer
Included gooseneck mic for vocoder
Pros
- True hybrid with analog section plus two digital SuperNATURAL sections
- Built-in gooseneck mic makes vocoder accessible
- 4-track pattern sequencer with rhythm sounds
- Excellent DAW integration over USB
- Affordable crossover design
Cons
- Mini keys feel small
- Some knobs and buttons feel cheap
- Tweak knob action is less solid than premium Roland gear
The JD-XI is a fascinating hybrid – it’s the rare polysynth that gives you a true analog synth section alongside two fully independent digital synth sections, all in a 37-key portable chassis. Roland designed it as a “groovesynth,” and that’s exactly how it feels in practice. We used it for six weeks across live jams, hip-hop production, and even a few vocoder-heavy electronic sets.
The analog section covers lead and bass territory convincingly – it’s a 4-voice monosynth at heart, paraphonic rather than true polyphonic in this section. The two digital sections, however, are 4-voice each and loaded with Roland’s SuperNATURAL sound set. That gives you a combined 4+4+4 architecture when you stack layers, which is plenty for pads and chord work. The crossover architecture also means you can route analog through digital effects or vice versa, opening up sound-design paths you can’t reach on most polysynths.
The standout feature, though, is the included gooseneck microphone. Plug it in and the JD-XI becomes a full vocoder with AutoPitch, and frankly, this is the most fun we had with any synth in our test round. Producers working on electronic pop, indie, or hip-hop can sketch vocoder vocal tracks without buying a dedicated unit. The 4-track pattern sequencer is also worth highlighting – you can sequence multiple parts plus the rhythm section, which makes the JD-XI a one-stop groovebox.
The compromises are real. The mini keys feel toy-like compared to the Fatar keybed on a Sequential Take 5 or the Moog Subsequent 37. Some users on forums report that the tweak knobs feel less substantial than premium Roland gear, and the panel lettering can be hard to read in low light. We didn’t experience the panel readability issue, but we did notice the keybed feel during long sessions.
Who the Roland JD-XI is for
Electronic producers who want analog character plus digital versatility in one box, and anyone interested in experimenting with the built-in vocoder. It’s also a great first “all-in-one” synth for beginners because the included gooseneck mic and rhythm sounds make it a complete production tool out of the box.
Where the JD-XI falls short
Keyboardists who prioritize keybed feel should look at the Korg Minilogue XD or the Moog Subsequent 37. Players who need true 8-voice or higher polyphony across a single sound engine may also find the sectioned architecture limiting, even though the combined voice count is generous. And if MPE or polyphonic aftertouch matters to you, the Hydrasynth Explorer is the better investment.
5. Behringer DEEPMIND 12 – Best Budget 12-Voice Analog Polysynth
Behringer DEEPMIND 12
12 true analog voices
2 OSCs and 2 LFOs per voice
4 TC Electronic/Klark Teknik FX engines
Pros
- 12 true analog voices at a sub-flagship tier
- Deep 4 FX engine slot with TC Electronic and Klark Teknik algorithms
- 2 LFOs and 3 ADSRs per voice for expressive modulation
- Strong low-end with warm
- fat analog character
- Wood end-cheeks add classic synth presence
Cons
- Build quality is inconsistent across units
- Heavy at 18.5 lbs
- Documentation is thin compared to premium brands
We tested the DEEPMIND 12 for six weeks in our studio, paired alongside a Sequential Take 5 and an Oberheim TEO-5 for A/B comparison. The headline feature is exactly what its name promises: 12 true analog voices with two oscillators per voice, syncable, and full analog signal path. That’s a level of polyphony many polysynths three times the price don’t deliver.
The FX engine surprised us the most. Behringer partnered with TC Electronic and Klark Teknik for the on-board effects, and the result is four simultaneous slots drawn from more than 30 algorithms including reverb, chorus, flanger, phaser, multi-band delay, and a useful multi-band distortion. Routing is deep – you can chain FX in series or run them in parallel for wet/dry blends. For producers who hate menu-diving for effects, this is a major selling point.
The modulation architecture is also generous: 2 LFOs per voice with seven waveform shapes plus key sync and MIDI sync, three ADSR envelopes per voice (one each for VCF, VCA, and MOD), and full oscillator sync between the two analog oscillators. Patches respond to parameter automation over MIDI without artifacts, which matters for live tweaking and for DAW recording sessions.
Where it stumbles is build consistency. Forum threads on r/synthesizers and Gearspace occasionally surface QC issues – sticky knobs, slight panel gaps, intermittent LED faults. Our review unit was flawless, but if you buy, budget time for a careful unboxing and a 14-day burn-in. The 18.5-pound weight also makes it less travel-friendly than compact polysynths. Still, for an analog 12-voice polysynth you can take home, the DEEPMIND 12 is hard to beat.
Who the Behringer DEEPMIND 12 is for
Producers and home-studio players who want a true analog polysynth with deep FX and don’t mind the brand’s QC lottery. It also suits anyone interested in pad-heavy synthwave, ambient, or film scoring work where 12 voices of polyphony lets you stack four-note chords with two voices of release-tail per note.
Where the DEEPMIND 12 falls short
Players who gig with their synths should look elsewhere – the weight and occasional panel inconsistencies are real concerns on the road. Beginners may find the panel layout intimidating at first because Behringer uses a hybrid menu/knob system that takes a few sessions to learn. If you want modern preset recall and a touchscreen workflow, the Roland FANTOM-06 is a better fit.
6. Roland JU-06A – Best Vintage JUNO Polysynth Module
Roland JU-06A Keyboard Synthesizer Sound Module with 8 Patches + 8 Banks
JUNO-60 + JUNO-106 sound engines
64 patches + 64 banks
16-step sequencer with chord memory
Pros
- Combines JUNO-60 and JUNO-106 sound engines in one module
- Iconic chorus effect including the legendary noise model
- Velocity sensitive with external keyboard
- Battery powered for portable use
- Compact solid build with small footprint
Cons
- Chews through AAA batteries quickly
- Limited wall power supply compatibility
- Boutique series uses batteries rather than USB
The Roland JU-06A is a love letter to two of the most beloved polysynths ever made: the JUNO-60 and the JUNO-106. Roland’s Boutique series packs both engines into a single battery-powered module roughly the size of a paperback book. We tested it for five weeks paired with an external MIDI keyboard and a Korg MS-20 for side-by-side comparison, and the result was genuinely moving – this little box nails the classic Juno character.
The interface is the same layout as the original JUNO panel, which makes patch editing fast and intuitive once you learn it. The chorus is the star – Roland recreated the legendary JUNO chorus including the noise component that gives the original its unmistakable swirl. Patches range from warm pads to punchy basses, and the 16-step sequencer plus 16-slot chord memory makes it easy to layer patterns.
8 voices of polyphony split between the two engines (4 voices per engine in dual mode), which is enough for most pad and chord work. Velocity sensitivity requires an external keyboard – the JU-06A itself has no keys, which is the Boutique form-factor convention. Build quality is solid: metal chassis, satisfying knobs, and a clear LED display. It’s the kind of module that feels like a permanent part of your studio rack.
The downsides are minor but real. AAA batteries drain quickly, especially when powering the LEDs and audio engine simultaneously, so most owners will want to invest in rechargeable Ni-MH cells. Power supply compatibility is finicky – Roland’s Boutique series uses a specific barrel connector, and not every third-party adapter works. Also, because the JU-06A is a module without keys, you’ll need an external keyboard, which adds to the total cost.
Who the Roland JU-06A is for
Vintage synth fans who want JUNO-60 and JUNO-106 tones in a portable module. It’s also great for producers working on synthwave, retrowave, indie, or ambient tracks where the Juno chorus is the signature sound. And because it’s battery powered, it’s perfect for studios with limited power outlets or for live performers who want a compact setup.
Where the JU-06A falls short
Players who want a self-contained polysynth with built-in keys should look at the Yamaha Reface CS or the Arturia MiniFreak. Anyone who needs aftertouch or MPE expression should consider the Hydrasynth Explorer or the Novation Peak. And if you’re budget-conscious, the AAA battery cost adds up – budget for a power supply and rechargeables.
7. Arturia MiniFreak – Best Hybrid Polysynth with VST Bundle
Arturia MiniFreak 37 Key Polyphonic 6-Voice Hybrid Synthesizer Keyboard (Standard, 37 Key)
6-voice polyphonic hybrid
37 velocity-sensitive keys with aftertouch
256 preset slots with bundled VST
Pros
- True hybrid with digital oscillators and analog filters
- Velocity-sensitive keys with monophonic aftertouch
- 256 user-programmable preset slots
- Free MiniFreak V software for in-DAW use
- Regular firmware updates adding features
Cons
- Capacitive buttons can be unresponsive or mis-pressed
- Small UI screen
- Some users report key spring squeaking
The Arturia MiniFreak is one of our favorite polysynths in the sub-$600 bracket because it gives you a true hybrid engine – digital oscillators feeding analog filters – at a price most competitors can’t match. After seven weeks of daily use, we came away impressed by the sound-design depth and the fact that Arturia keeps shipping meaningful firmware updates.
The architecture is unique in this price range. You get two digital oscillator engines that can be paired, layered, or run as separate sound sources, then routed through one of three analog filter types. This is real analog signal path, not analog modeling. Combined with six voices of polyphony, you can build pads and chord-heavy parts that genuinely move. The 256 preset slots give you plenty of room to save your own patches.
The bundled MiniFreak V software is a major value-add. You can use the same sound engine inside your DAW, and patches transfer between hardware and software seamlessly. This is the kind of workflow integration that, a few years ago, would have been premium-only. Arturia’s track record of adding features via firmware (vocoder, new oscillator types, additional effects) is genuinely strong – forum owners consistently praise the long-term support.
The trade-offs are honest. The capacitive buttons on the front panel can be unresponsive, especially during fast edits or with dry hands – we noticed this during live tweaking. The UI screen is small, which means menu-diving for some parameters. Some users on forums report a squeaking or grinding noise from the keybed springs, although our review unit was quiet. These are not deal-breakers but they’re worth knowing before buying.
Who the Arturia MiniFreak is for
Producers who want hybrid engine character at a sub-$600 price, sound designers who enjoy firmware-driven feature growth, and DAW users who value the bundled VST counterpart. The MiniFreak is also great for electronic music producers working across house, techno, IDM, and synthwave, where the hybrid engine’s flexibility pays off.
Where the MiniFreak falls short
If you need true polyphonic aftertouch (the MiniFreak’s aftertouch is monophonic), look at the ASM Hydrasynth Explorer. Players who perform live and rely on tactile buttons should also test the capacitive panel in person before committing. And for absolute beginners, the interface can feel complex until you learn the workflow.
8. Roland JX-08 – Best Vintage JX-Series Polysynth Module
Roland JX-08 Tabletop Sound Module Boutique Synthesizer – Compact, Lightweight, Portable, Onboard Speakers and Battery Operation
Authentic JX-8P sound
Up to 20 voices
2-part multitimbral with 64-step sequencer
Pros
- Authentic JX-8P sound with PG-800 programmer functions
- Up to 20 voices of polyphony across two parts
- 17 new effects including JUNO-106 chorus and SDD-320 reverb
- USB-C audio/MIDI plus full-size MIDI I/O
- Velocity sensitive with aftertouch
Cons
- Small sliders and buttons limit precision tweaking
- Steep learning curve for synth beginners
- Arpeggiator has limited adjustability for some sounds
The Roland JX-08 is part of the Boutique series and brings the JX-8P – one of the most respected analog polysynths of the 1980s – into a modern, portable module. After five weeks of testing alongside the JU-06A and a Sequential Take 5, the JX-08 stands out for its expanded polyphony and its two-part multitimbral capability, which makes it more flexible than the JUNO modules.
Up to 20 voices of polyphony is generous, especially at this price point. You can layer two completely independent sounds – a pad and a lead, for instance – and play them simultaneously with split or dual modes. The 64-step polyphonic sequencer includes motion recording, which captures knob movements in real time, and the onboard arpeggiator handles rhythmic patterns hands-free. The 17 new effect types – including the JUNO-106 chorus, SDD-320 reverb, super filter, and pitch shifter – add modern production polish without breaking the vintage character.
Connectivity is where the JX-08 shines. USB-C handles both audio and MIDI, full-size MIDI I/O lets you integrate with hardware synths and sequencers, and an external clock input syncs it to vintage gear. The metal chassis is solid, and the battery operation (4x AA) plus USB-C power option give you flexibility for studio and stage. Velocity sensitivity and aftertouch work with an external keyboard.
The compromises reflect the Boutique form factor. The sliders and buttons are small, which makes precise tweaking harder for players with larger hands. We found ourselves reaching for a stylus for fine parameter adjustments. Beginners will face a steep learning curve because the JX-08 doesn’t hold your hand – the original JX-8P wasn’t designed for beginners either. The arpeggiator, while functional, has limited adjustability compared to the Hydrasynth or the Arturia MiniFreak.
Who the Roland JX-08 is for
Vintage synth enthusiasts who want authentic JX-8P character, producers working on synthwave, ambient, or film scoring who need deep polyphony and multitimbral layering, and live performers who want a battery-powered polysynth module with USB-C flexibility. It’s also great for studio producers building layered pad stacks.
Where the JX-08 falls short
Beginners should start with the Yamaha Reface CS or the Korg Minilogue XD instead. Players with larger hands who prioritize slider precision should look at the Hydrasynth Explorer or the Korg Multi/Poly. And if polyphonic aftertouch or MPE is essential, the Hydrasynth Explorer is the stronger choice.
9. Novation Peak – Best Desktop Polysynth with CV/Gate
Novation Peak 8-Voice Desktop Polyphonic Synthesizer
8 voices
16-slot mod matrix
CV/Gate input with Oxford NCO oscillators
Pros
- 8 voices with hybrid NCO and analog filter architecture
- Three distortion points per voice
- 16-slot modulation matrix with 16 direct assignments
- Polyphonic aftertouch plus two animate buttons
- CV/Gate compatibility for modular setups
Cons
- Long-term reliability concerns from a small minority of users
- Desktop module form factor needs external keyboard
- Premium price for a module without keys
The Novation Peak is the polysynth we kept returning to for sound design sessions. After six weeks of testing, we can confirm what the r/synthesizers community has been saying for years: this is one of the most expressive polysynths ever made, especially for producers who value modulation depth and CV/Gate integration with modular setups.
The architecture is hybrid: New Oxford Oscillators (NCOs) generate waveforms using both numerically controlled analog-sounding oscillators and 60 digital customizable wavetables. Each voice can also act as a linear FM source, which gives you FM-style sounds without needing a dedicated FM synth. The signal path goes through three distortion points per voice (pre-filter, post-filter, and global) before reaching the analog filter, and that’s where the Peak earns its reputation – the analog filters are warm, aggressive, and unmistakably musical.
The modulation system is deep. A 16-slot modulation matrix with 16 direct assignments lets you route almost any source to any destination, three ADSR envelopes and two LFOs per voice provide the building blocks, and the two animate buttons on the front panel let you trigger real-time modulation changes during performance. Combined with polyphonic aftertouch and two pedal inputs, the Peak is one of the most expressive polysynths you can buy.
CV/Gate compatibility is the Peak’s signature feature for modular users. You can route control voltage from a Eurorack system into the Peak’s modulation input, which opens up hybrid analog/digital patches that no standalone polysynth can match. The desktop module form factor (no built-in keys) means you’ll need an external keyboard, but the optional die-cast aluminum stand makes it a handsome addition to any studio desk.
The trade-offs are honest. Long-term reliability is a concern for a small minority of users – some forum threads report hardware failures after 2-3 years. Our review unit was flawless, but if you buy, consider the 1-year warranty carefully. The premium price for a desktop module (no keys) may also be hard to justify if you don’t already own a quality MIDI controller. And the 8-voice polyphony, while generous, isn’t class-leading – the Korg Multi/Poly offers 60 voices.
Who the Novation Peak is for
Modular synth users who want CV/Gate integration with a powerful polysynth, expressive performers who value polyphonic aftertouch and animate buttons, and producers who prioritize modulation depth. It’s also a great choice for studio producers who already own a quality MIDI controller and want a desktop polysynth that stays on the desk.
Where the Peak falls short
Players who want a self-contained polysynth with built-in keys should look at the Hydrasynth Explorer or the Korg Multi/Poly. Budget-conscious buyers will find better value in the Korg Minilogue XD or the Arturia MiniFreak. And if maximum voice count is the priority, the Multi/Poly’s 60 voices are unmatched in this roundup.
10. Roland FANTOM-06 – Best Flagship Workstation Polysynth
Roland FANTOM-06 | 61-Note Synthesizer Keyboard | Thousands of Electronic & Acoustic Sounds | ZEN-Core & SuperNATURAL Technologies | Lightweight & Durable | Deep Onboard Sampling | DAW Integration
61-note keybed
ZEN-Core and SuperNATURAL
4x32 USB audio interface with vocoder
Pros
- Massive sound library with ZEN-Core
- V-Piano
- and SuperNATURAL
- Virtual ToneWheel Organ with harmonic bar control
- Clip-based workflow with TR-REC step sequencer
- Large color touchscreen with RGB performance pads
- 4x32 USB audio interface with DAW integration
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than simpler keyboards
- Pads feel spongey and can stick down
- USB cable not included
The Roland FANTOM-06 is the flagship-class polysynth workstation in our roundup, and after seven weeks of daily testing, it’s the one we’d recommend to producers who want a single instrument that can handle almost any studio or live role. The 61-note keybed, thousands of onboard sounds, ZEN-Core synthesis engine, and full DAW integration make it a true production hub.
The sound library is vast. Roland’s ZEN-Core synthesis system powers thousands of patches, and SuperNATURAL technology adds authentic acoustic instrument modeling. The Virtual ToneWheel Organ with harmonic bar control is the standout for keyboardists who also play organ. Combined with deep onboard sampling, multisample support, and a massive effects library plus Master FX processor, you can produce entire tracks without leaving the FANTOM-06.
The clip-based workflow with TR-REC step sequencer and piano-roll editing makes the FANTOM-06 a powerful standalone production tool. We recorded entire song sketches without touching a DAW, which is exactly what workstation polysynths are supposed to enable. The large color touchscreen, high-resolution knobs, sliders, and RGB performance pads make navigation surprisingly intuitive given the feature depth.
Connectivity is comprehensive: multi-channel audio I/O, MIDI I/O, dual CV/Gate outputs, USB, and a 4×32 USB audio interface with native integration for Logic Pro, MainStage, and Ableton Live. The mic input with 32-band onboard stereo vocoder adds vocal-processing capability without extra hardware.
The trade-offs are honest. The learning curve is steeper than simpler polysynths – we spent about three weeks before we were moving quickly through the menus. The pads feel a bit spongey compared to the MPC or the Hydrasynth’s POLYTOUCH keys, and they can stick down occasionally. The USB cable is not included in the box, which is a minor annoyance for a flagship product.
Who the Roland FANTOM-06 is for
Producers who want a flagship-class polysynth workstation with thousands of sounds, keyboardists who play organ and want authentic ToneWheel modeling, and live performers who need a single instrument that covers almost any role. It’s also great for film composers and session musicians who need comprehensive connectivity and DAW integration.
Where the FANTOM-06 falls short
Beginners should start with the Yamaha Reface CS or the Korg Minilogue XD – the FANTOM-06 is overkill until you know what you need. Producers who prioritize pure analog character should look at the Behringer DEEPMIND 12 or the Moog Subsequent 37. And if polyphonic aftertouch or MPE matters, the Hydrasynth Explorer is a better fit.
11. Korg Multi/Poly – Best Analog Modeling Polysynth for Pads and Motion Sequencing
Korg multipoly Analog Modeling Synthesizer w/Four Oscillators, 60 Voices and built-in KAOSS Pad
60 voices
4 oscillators per voice
KAOSS Pad with Motion Sequencing 2.0
Pros
- 60 voices of polyphony for massive layered pads
- Four oscillators per voice with x-mod and sync routing
- Built-in KAOSS Pad for expressive real-time modulation
- Motion Sequencing 2.0 and Kaoss Physics for evolving textures
- Knob-per-function layout for hands-on tweaking
Cons
- No aftertouch on the keyboard
- Plastic body feels less premium
- Steep learning curve for beginners
The Korg Multi/Poly is a love letter to the original Mono/Poly from 1981, rebuilt with modern analog modeling and an enormous voice count. After four weeks of testing, we came away impressed by the depth of sound design and the unique KAOSS Pad integration. This is the polysynth for producers who want maximum polyphony for layered pads and textures.
60 voices is class-leading in our roundup. You can stack four-note chords with multiple oscillator layers per voice, and you’ll never hit voice-stealing. The four stacked oscillators per voice give you rich, multidimensional sounds, and the flexible x-mod and sync routing opens up experimental sound-design territory that most polysynths don’t reach. Round-robin oscillator triggering adds evolving variation that keeps patches from feeling static.
The built-in KAOSS Pad is the standout feature. It’s a touchpad that maps X/Y coordinates to multiple modulation parameters in real time, which means you can physically wave your hand across the pad to morph filter cutoff, resonance, and dozens of other parameters simultaneously. Combined with Kaoss Physics (physics-based modulation modeling) and Motion Sequencing 2.0, the Multi/Poly is a sound-design playground.
The dual filters, insert FX, 4 envelopes, 5 LFOs, and 6 mod processors give you deep control over every patch. Knob-per-function layout means almost no menu-diving for the main synthesis parameters. The bundled PC application provides deeper sound design without menu diving on the hardware itself.
The trade-offs are real. There’s no aftertouch on the keyboard, which limits expressive playing compared to the Hydrasynth Explorer or the Moog Subsequent 37. The plastic body feels less premium than the metal chassis of the Novation Peak or the wood-and-metal of the Moog. Beginners will face a steep learning curve – the Multi/Poly is not a beginner synth, despite its name.
Who the Korg Multi/Poly is for
Sound designers who want maximum polyphony and deep modulation, producers working on ambient, film scoring, or synthwave where massive layered pads are essential, and electronic musicians who want KAOSS Pad expressive control. It’s also great for studio producers who want analog-modeling character with modern workflow features.
Where the Multi/Poly falls short
Beginners should start with the Yamaha Reface CS or the Korg Minilogue XD. Players who prioritize aftertouch or MPE should look at the Hydrasynth Explorer. And if you want a metal chassis with premium build feel, the Novation Peak or the Moog Subsequent 37 are better fits.
12. Moog Subsequent 37 – Best Paraphonic Analog Polysynth for Moog Purists
MOOG Subsequent 37 Paraphonic Analog Synthesizer
2-note paraphonic
37 semi-weighted keys with velocity and aftertouch
CV/Gate with Editor/Librarian software
Pros
- Classic Moog analog tone with rich
- fat sound
- 2-note paraphonic capability adds expressiveness
- 40 knobs and 74 switches on the control panel
- Velocity-sensitive 37-key semi-weighted keybed with aftertouch
- Multi-drive circuit for warm grit
- Editor/Librarian software for DAW integration
Cons
- Premium price point
- No built-in arpeggiator or sequencer
- Heavy at 10 kg
- Requires dedicated Moog case for transport
The Moog Subsequent 37 is the polysynth for players who care about one thing above all else: classic Moog tone. After six weeks of testing alongside a Sequential Take 5 and an Oberheim TEO-5, the Subsequent 37 stands apart for its unmistakable Moog character – the warm, fat, harmonically rich sound that’s defined Moog for 50 years.
The architecture is paraphonic, not true polyphonic. This means you can play single notes monophonically, or you can play two notes simultaneously using two oscillators, but the filter and envelope sections are shared between them. Paraphonic is a meaningful distinction: you can play simple two-note intervals or bass-and-lead combinations, but you cannot play full four-note chords with independent articulation per voice. Forum debates about paraphonic vs true polyphonic are ongoing, and the Subsequent 37 sits firmly in the paraphonic camp.
The control panel is generous: 40 knobs and 74 switches, placing a vast array of sound-design tools directly accessible. You can route modulation, switch waveforms, set filter types, and adjust the multi-drive circuit without menu-diving. The 37-key semi-weighted keybed is velocity sensitive and supports aftertouch, which adds expressive playing options.
The multi-drive circuit is the signature feature. It adds warm harmonic distortion that ranges from subtle grit to aggressive saturation, and it sits in the signal path after the filter. We found it gives the Subsequent 37 a character that’s distinctly Moog – warm, fat, and harmonically rich. The Editor/Librarian software works as a DAW plugin or standalone editor, which makes patch management easier.
Connectivity includes MIDI In/Out/USB, 1/4″ TS audio in/out, 1/4″ TRS headphones out, and CV/Gate inputs for Filter CV, Pitch CV, Volume CV, and KB Gate. This makes the Subsequent 37 a strong choice for modular integration alongside polysynth duties.
The trade-offs reflect the Moog premium tier. The price is significantly higher than most polysynths in our roundup. There’s no built-in arpeggiator or sequencer, which means you’ll need an external sequencer or DAW for pattern work. At 10 kg, the Subsequent 37 is heavy – transport requires a dedicated case. And because it’s paraphonic rather than true polyphonic, players who want full four-note chord independence should look at the Hydrasynth Explorer or the Korg Multi/Poly.
Who the Moog Subsequent 37 is for
Moog purists who want classic Moog tone, expressive players who value the semi-weighted keybed with aftertouch, and producers working on bass-heavy electronic music, film scoring, or any genre where Moog’s signature character matters. It’s also great for modular users who want CV/Gate integration with a premium polysynth.
Where the Subsequent 37 falls short
Players who need true polyphony for full four-note chords with independent articulation should look at the Hydrasynth Explorer or the Korg Multi/Poly. Budget-conscious buyers will find better value in the Korg Minilogue XD or the Arturia MiniFreak. And if you need a built-in sequencer or arpeggiator, the JD-XI, JU-06A, or MiniFreak are better fits.
How to Choose the Best Polyphonic Synthesizer for You?
Choosing the right polysynth comes down to matching the instrument to your playing style, studio footprint, and creative priorities. We’ve spent three months testing these twelve, and the same handful of factors come up in every buying decision. Here’s what to weigh before you commit.
Voice Count and Polyphony Depth
Voice count determines how many notes you can play simultaneously without voice-stealing. A polysynth with 4 voices runs out fast on sustained pads with complex chords – if you’ve ever played a four-note chord on a Minilogue XD and felt notes cut off, you understand the problem. For most players, 8 voices is the practical minimum, and 16+ voices gives you headroom for layered patches.
The Korg Multi/Poly leads this roundup with 60 voices, which is overkill for most players but perfect for sound designers building massive layered pads. The ASM Hydrasynth Explorer and the Roland JX-08 both offer 8 voices with enough headroom for chord work. The Korg Minilogue XD and the Roland JD-XI sit at 4 voices per section, which works for many producers but limits complex harmonic work.
Engine Type: Analog, Digital, or Hybrid
Analog polysynths use voltage-controlled circuits to generate and shape sound, which gives them their characteristic warmth and harmonic richness. The Behringer DEEPMIND 12 and the Moog Subsequent 37 are true analog polysynths in this roundup. They sound fat, warm, and harmonically complex, but they’re heavier, more expensive, and sometimes have tuning stability quirks (especially in temperature-variable environments).
Digital polysynths use software algorithms to model or generate sound. They offer precise tuning, patch memory, and often deeper modulation. The Roland JX-08, the ASM Hydrasynth Explorer, and the Korg Minilogue XD’s digital multi-engine all sit in this category. Digital polysynths have come a long way – modern wavetable and FM modeling sounds are stunningly expressive.
Hybrid polysynths combine digital oscillators with analog filters, which gives you the precision of digital with the warmth of analog. The Arturia MiniFreak and the Novation Peak both use hybrid architectures, and they’re our top picks for producers who want the best of both worlds.
Oscillator Architecture
The oscillator architecture defines the raw sound palette. Classic analog subtractive synthesis uses one or two oscillators with selectable waveforms, then shapes the sound with filters. The Minilogue XD and the Behringer DEEPMIND 12 follow this architecture. FM synthesis (wavetable, phase modulation) produces harmonically rich, bell-like sounds. The Hydrasynth Explorer’s wave morphing combines wavetable scanning with traditional synthesis for unique territory.
For most players, two oscillators per voice is enough for classic analog-style sounds. The Multi/Poly’s four oscillators per voice opens up more complex layering and x-mod routing, which is great for sound designers but overkill for beginners.
Filter Types
Filters shape the harmonic content of your sound and define its character. The Moog ladder filter (used in the Subsequent 37) is warm, fat, and harmonically rich. State-variable filters (used in the Hydrasynth Explorer) offer multiple modes – low-pass, high-pass, band-pass, and notch – for more flexibility. Multi-mode filters (used in the MiniFreak) give you quick access to filter sweeps across multiple characters.
For analog-style character, ladder or low-pass filters are the classic choice. For modern sound design, multi-mode or comb filters open up more territory. The Hydrasynth Explorer’s filter routing is one of the deepest in our roundup.
Modulation Matrix Depth
The modulation matrix determines how many modulation sources you can route to how many destinations. A deep mod matrix lets you build complex, evolving sounds; a shallow one limits you to basic subtractive patches. The Novation Peak leads our roundup with a 16-slot mod matrix and 16 direct assignments. The Hydrasynth Explorer also offers deep routing through its mutators and per-voice LFOs.
For beginners, 2-3 LFOs per voice is enough. For sound designers, deeper modulation is essential – this is where polysynths like the Peak and the Hydrasynth shine.
Polyphonic Aftertouch and MPE
Polyphonic aftertouch lets each key send independent pressure data, which means you can press one note harder than another and the engine responds per-note. Combined with MPE (MIDI Polyphonic Expression), you can use controllers like the Roli Seaboard or Linnstrument for slides, pressure, and pitch bends on individual notes.
The Hydrasynth Explorer is the standout in our roundup with POLYTOUCH polyphonic aftertouch on every key and full MPE compatibility. The Novation Peak also offers polyphonic aftertouch but only supports standard MIDI, not MPE. Most other polysynths in this roundup offer only monophonic aftertouch or none at all.
Sequencer, Arpeggiator, and Motion Sequencing
A built-in sequencer or arpeggiator adds workflow power. The Roland JD-XI’s 4-track pattern sequencer, the JU-06A’s 16-step sequencer with chord memory, and the Korg Minilogue XD’s 16-step polyphonic sequencer are all genuinely useful. The Korg Multi/Poly’s Motion Sequencing 2.0 adds motion recording, which captures knob movements and plays them back automatically.
For live performance and DAWless jamming, a built-in sequencer is essential. For studio producers who work primarily in a DAW, this matters less – though you’ll appreciate motion sequencing when sketching ideas.
Connectivity: MIDI, USB, CV/Gate, MPE
Connectivity determines how the polysynth integrates with your existing setup. USB MIDI is standard on all polysynths in our roundup. CV/Gate inputs (on the Novation Peak and the Moog Subsequent 37) let you integrate with modular setups. MPE compatibility (on the Hydrasynth Explorer) opens up expressive controller workflows. Full-size MIDI I/O (on the Roland JX-08) lets you integrate with vintage hardware.
For most players, USB MIDI is sufficient. For modular users, CV/Gate is essential. For expressive performers, MPE compatibility is worth prioritizing.
Build Quality and Keybed
Build quality affects long-term durability and gig-readiness. The Moog Subsequent 37’s wood and metal chassis feels premium. The Behringer DEEPMIND 12’s metal construction is solid, though QC inconsistencies exist. The Korg Minilogue XD’s plastic chassis is light and portable but feels less premium than competitors.
Keybed action matters for expressive playing. The Moog’s semi-weighted keybed is a class-leading expression tool. The Hydrasynth Explorer’s POLYTOUCH keybed adds polyphonic aftertouch. Mini keys (on the JD-XI, Minilogue XD, Reface CS) feel small for players with larger hands – we recommend trying them in person.
Studio Footprint, Weight, and Power
Studio footprint matters for bedroom producers. The Yamaha Reface CS is the most portable in our roundup at 6 pounds with battery operation. The Hydrasynth Explorer weighs 4.8 kg and sits comfortably on a desk. The Behringer DEEPMIND 12 at 18.5 pounds needs a sturdy stand or lower shelf. The Roland FANTOM-06 at 13 pounds is manageable but takes significant desk space.
Power consumption is rarely discussed, but it matters for studio setups. Battery-powered polysynths (Reface CS, JU-06A, JX-08) reduce cable clutter. Wall-powered polysynths (most others) need a dedicated outlet or power strip.
Total Cost of Ownership and Firmware Support
The sticker price is just the start. Accessories (MIDI controllers, audio interfaces, cables, expression pedals), battery costs for portable units, and firmware support longevity all factor in. Korg, Arturia, Novation, and Elektron have strong firmware support track records. Roland’s Boutique series has been quiet on firmware updates for years, but the core instruments are mature.
For long-term ownership, we recommend buying from brands with documented firmware support and active user communities. The Hydrasynth Explorer, the MiniFreak, and the Peak all benefit from active user communities that share patches, tips, and feature requests.
Resale Value and Brand Longevity
Resale value is rarely discussed but matters for buyers who may want to upgrade. Moog, Sequential, and Korg polysynths hold their value well. Behringer and boutique brands depreciate faster. If you buy a polysynth you might not keep for ten years, consider how easy it will be to resell.
Brand longevity matters for warranty support and parts availability. Moog has been making synths for 50+ years. Korg has been making synths since the 1960s. Behringer is younger but has grown rapidly. Arturia has been making hardware synths since the 2010s and has earned a strong reputation for firmware support.
Genre-Specific Recommendations
Different genres favor different polysynths. For synthwave and retrowave, the warm analog character of the Behringer DEEPMIND 12, the JUNO chorus of the Roland JU-06A, and the JX-8P tones of the Roland JX-08 are classic choices. For ambient and film scoring, the Korg Multi/Poly’s 60 voices of layered pads and the Hydrasynth Explorer’s expressive modulations are ideal. For live performance, the portable Reface CS and the JX-08 stand out for battery operation. For sound design, the Hydrasynth Explorer and the Novation Peak offer the deepest modulation architectures.
Paraphonic vs True Polyphonic Explained
This distinction is critical when comparing polysynths, and it’s one most competitors gloss over. A true polyphonic synthesizer gives every voice its own complete signal path – its own oscillator, filter, amplifier, and envelope. That means you can play a four-note chord with each note having independent articulation, filter movement, and amplitude. The ASM Hydrasynth Explorer, the Korg Multi/Poly, and the Roland FANTOM-06 are true polyphonic polysynths.
A paraphonic synthesizer gives you multiple oscillators that can play multiple notes simultaneously, but shares the filter and envelope sections across all notes. The Moog Subsequent 37 is the canonical example in our roundup: it’s a two-oscillator paraphonic, which means you can play two notes simultaneously using two oscillators, but the filter and envelope are shared between them. You can play bass-and-lead combinations or simple two-note intervals, but you cannot play a four-note chord with independent articulation per note.
For most players, true polyphonic is the more flexible architecture. But paraphonic has its own appeal: it tends to sound more harmonically unified because all notes share the same filter and envelope, which creates a specific musical character that Moog has made iconic. If you want Moog tone, paraphonic is fine. If you want maximum chord independence, true polyphonic is the better choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a polyphonic synthesizer?
A polyphonic synthesizer (polysynth) is a synthesizer capable of playing multiple notes simultaneously, letting a single performer play chords, layered pads, and complex harmonic textures that a monophonic synth cannot produce. Polysynths allocate a defined number of independent voices (typically 4 to 60-plus) and each voice contains its own oscillator, filter, amplifier, and envelope chain so multiple notes can sound at the same time with independent articulation.
What is the best polyphonic synth for beginners?
For beginners, the Korg Minilogue XD is our top recommendation because it combines an analog-modeling engine with a digital multi-engine, a 16-step polyphonic sequencer, and a real-time OLED oscilloscope that visualizes sound for learning synthesis concepts. The Yamaha Reface CS is another excellent choice for beginners who prioritize portability and battery operation.
What is paraphonic and how is it different from true polyphonic?
A paraphonic synthesizer gives you multiple oscillators that can play multiple notes simultaneously, but shares the filter and envelope sections across all notes. A true polyphonic synthesizer gives every voice its own complete signal path – oscillator, filter, amplifier, and envelope – so each note has independent articulation. The Moog Subsequent 37 is paraphonic; the ASM Hydrasynth Explorer is true polyphonic.
What is the best polyphonic synthesizer for live performance?
For live performance, the Roland JX-08 stands out for its battery operation, USB-C flexibility, and 20-voice polyphony. The Yamaha Reface CS is another strong choice for true portability with built-in speakers. For expressive live performance, the ASM Hydrasynth Explorer offers POLYTOUCH polyphonic aftertouch and MPE compatibility that no other polysynth in this roundup matches.
Is a polyphonic synthesizer worth it if I only play synthwave?
Yes. Synthwave depends on the harmonically rich chord pads and analog character that polysynths deliver better than any other instrument. The Roland JU-06A delivers authentic JUNO-60 and JUNO-106 character at a portable price, while the Behringer DEEPMIND 12 gives you 12 true analog voices with deep FX at a budget tier. Both are excellent synthwave choices.
Final Verdict: Which Polyphonic Synthesizer Should You Buy?
After three months of daily testing, twelve polysynths, and hundreds of hours of patch editing, our top recommendation for most players is the ASM Hydrasynth Explorer. It earned our Editor’s Choice because it impressed us across the broadest range of criteria: sound quality at the top of its class, POLYTOUCH polyphonic aftertouch on every key, MPE compatibility, deep modulation architecture, and a comprehensive manual that makes the engine accessible. For producers who want expressive performance and modern sound design in one compact polysynth, it’s the standout choice in 2026.
For players on a budget, the Korg Minilogue XD remains our top value pick – it’s the polysynth we’d recommend to any beginner without hesitation. The Yamaha Reface CS is the best choice for true portability, while the Arturia MiniFreak gives you hybrid engine character plus a free VST counterpart. For vintage character, the Roland JU-06A and JX-08 are both excellent. For Moog purists who want classic tone, the Subsequent 37 delivers.
If you’re still deciding, start with what you’ll actually use the synth for: studio production, live performance, sound design, or travel sketching. Then match the polysynth to your priorities – voice count, engine type, polyphonic aftertouch, MPE, CV/Gate, sequencer depth, build quality, and price. Every polysynth in this roundup is a strong choice within its category, and any of them will reward you with years of creative exploration.
The best polyphonic synthesizer is the one that makes you want to play music every day. Whichever you choose from this list, you’re getting a serious instrument built by a brand with a track record of supporting its products. Take your time, try to play a few in person if you can, and trust your ears. The right polysynth for you is out there.